Why Small Businesses Should Adopt a Hosted Phone System

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Every small and medium-sized business (SMB) has two sometimes conflicting concerns: Ensuring that client and customer needs are met with the highest degree of quality and professionalism while also balancing an oftentimes tight budget. Many small business owners may envy larger enterprises and their ability to spend more freely to get the best possible technologies, but it turns out that this mindset is false as far as your telephone system is concerned.

With Woffle's Hosted Business Phone System, even the smallest and thriftiest of companies can have a high quality contact and call center solution that has the same functionality and tools as the services utilised by most major firms. The key to bringing this technology to the so-called masses is the cloud.

Perhaps you've already heard about the cloud, as it is a much hyped and talked about technology in IT and business circles these days. Basically, cloud computing involves leveraging services stored in remote data centers through a quality internet connection instead of from on-site infrastructure. With a hosted phone service, this means that calling is handled remotely, so SMBs don't have to worry about making sure the telephone wiring and on-premise business branch exchange is always in top shape.

By turning to the cloud, a business can achieve all of the same benefits as a traditional phone service, but without the added costs of purchasing and maintaining equipment. So long as a company has a quality internet connection - which is something any smart business should have anyway - then they have everything they need for leveraging a hosted phone service. Woffle's plans start at $12 a month, and our monthly payment options ensure that the solution is always affordable.

Of course, price is only one part of the puzzle. One of the main benefits of a hosted solution is that it allows a business to effectively combine their phone system with other modes of communication. Your calling, email, chat, voicemail and screen sharing solutions can all be more easily interwoven when they are powered by the same technology. Just imagine your delight when you realize that not only does your budget-friendly phone solution look and sound like the systems used by major enterprises but that in fact it is likely better than what the biggest businesses are currently using. No matter what the underlying cloud technology or what kind of features it has, a hosted phone solution is the ideal choice for any SMB looking to grow and prosper.

 

describe the image


SIP Trunk & Save!

Monday, April 29, 2013

SWITCHING TO SIP TRUNKS MAKES SENSE

We get a lot of queries about how to reduce the number of PSTN and ISDN lines (and therefore reducing the line rental charges). 

As long as we can be assured of a good quality ADSL connection at your site, the reality is you can significantly reduce your Telco charges by reducing the number of phone lines you have in place and replacing them with a Hosted Voice or a SIP trunk solution.  

Hosted Voice is a Phone System that runs over VoIP. SIP trunks are VoIP lines that connect to a PBX phone system. SIP trunks connect to an Office  PBX Phone System using Analogue Telephone Adapters or with current IP capable equipment ports are already built in the systems.  

For example ...a business with 6 PSTN phone lines could reduce the number of PSTN phone lines on the Phone System by replacing 5 lines on their Phone System with 5 SIP trunks and the saving in line rental alone would be around $140 a month without taking into account the cheaper phone calls.  

The pros are the significant savings to be had and portability of your numbers. Calls to Local and Long Distance numbers are usually at a fixed rate, Inter office calls usually free and calls to mobiles are significantly cheaper. 

Because the numbers then reside with your Phone System rather than on a carrier network, if you move you pick up your phone system and your numbers will move with you.  

You do need to make sure you go with a reputable SIP provider who suppliesBusiness Grade SIP trunks. A budget carrier will probably have off shore support and cut lots of corners.  

A reputable and quality SIP provider will have some pre requisites in regard to equipment types and will want to supply and configure the equipment before sending it to you. This can be the difference between getting quality calls or having a system that is basically non functioning and un useable. If you cut corners with your equipment you are asking for ongoing problems.  

The cons are that if you lose your internet service for any reason you wont be able to make outgoing calls from your SIP trunks. Incoming calls can be set up to immediately divert to a mobile air another site if the lines are unavailable.  

You can also port your existing Phone numbers onto your SIP trunks. This can take up to 3 months to achieve but it typically done in around 4-5 weeks. When your numbers port your numbers your old phone lines will be disconnected automatically. 

A further advantage is that you NBN/future proof your phone lines. All they need is an internet connection to work so regardless of how your internet is delivered or where you are located, you get to keep your numbers. For example of you relocate your business to another area, you can take your SIP trunk numbers with you as they have no relationship with the local phone exchange. You can also get numbers from other areas to emulate having you business located in another state for example.  

There isn't much point doing this is you have a single phone line and don't make a lot of calls. But anything above 2 lines doesn't make sense these days. It really makes sense to consider the switch to SIP Trunks

http://woffle.com.au/landlines/sip-trunks

How fast is a Gigabit Internet connection? #nbn

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

fiber.google-640x423
SUMMARY:

It’s tough to count how many homes have a gigabit connection, but we can try to get some numbers to give a sense of how prevalent such connectivity is. The answer is not very.

As Google expands its commitment to bringing fiber-to-the-home gigabit connections to more places, I wondered exactly how many people actually have gigabit connections. So I asked Ookla, the company that operates the Speedtest.net service for its data. Turns out, there’s no real way to calculate who has a gig, but the numbers we do have indicate that not too many people are living in the future when it comes to connectivity.

It turns out that between the first of this year and April 8 (when I got the data from Ookla) roughly one in 10,000 devices in the U.S. are surfing at gigabit speeds and roughly 1 in 5,000 homes worldwide can match them. Ookla runs the popularSpeedtest.Net service and got this data from users who tested their connections during that time period.

ooklagigabit
Unfortunately, the data on this is relatively inexact, because the art of measuring a gigabit is complicated. As late as last summer when Google launched the first plans for a fiber to the home buildout in Kansas City, the search giant had to work with Ookla to upgrade the test to even be able to read a gigabit. Even so, some customers with a gigabit might not show up because their Wi-Fi routers or computers can’t achieve those speeds and, thus, throttle them back to a mere 100 Mbps or so.

And the numbers provided by Ookla actually measure customers with speeds of above 800 Mbps, which is what it classifies as a gigabit. In the U.S. only 4,110 people have test results at that speed out of 45,468,731 people who used the Ookla tests. Globally, 34,721 users have speeds that high out of 224,404,945 tests. But, clearly not every broadband user is running Speedtest.net or has the right equipment.

gigabitchart

Ookla also provides data on the number of people whose connection speeds are 300 Mbps or greater. In the U.S. this was about 51,100 devices or about 11 in every ten thousand users. Globally it was 204,315 devices or 9 in every 10,000 users.

For additional data points, we can turn to the Fiber to the Home Council, which said a few weeks ago that 640,000 subscribers are buying connections of 100 Mbps or more across North America. That’s a significant number, although the FTTH Council is measuring capacity that is 10 times less than what a gigabit connection can offer. For reference, the FCC in February noted that the average U.S. subscribed broadband speed is now 15.6 Mbps, representing an average annualized speed increase of about 20 percent. And below is a chart from FCC data at the end of 2011 showing the distribution of broadband speeds at the time.

This chart measures both wireless and wireline speeds as of Dec. 2011.

This chart measures both wireless and wireline speeds as of Dec. 2011.

But it looks like the FTTH Council — as well as Google’s experience in getting 90 percent of the neighborhoods in Kansas City signed up for fiber — can tell us something definitive about gigabit connections: People want them. When fiber-to-the home is offered 44.8 percent of the homes passed take the service. Given that those are generally the most expensive connections, that’s a pretty high take rate.

So it looks like even a few thousand Kansas City, Austin, Texas or Provo, Utah homes connected via Google Fiber will not only significantly change the percentage of gigabit customers in the U.S. but also around the globe. Still, we have to start somewhere.

Embrace the Cloud & improve your communications!!

Sunday, April 07, 2013

These days, small businesses have a whole host of concerns to deal with, whether they are looking to cut costs or increase efficiency. Of course, underlying many of these concerns is communications. After all, it's hard for an organisation to get anything done if employees are unable to effectively pass along their ideas or feedback!

However, once a business finally realises how important communications is, the real battle has just begun. From there, decision makers must figure out what solution is best suited for their needs. While there are many options now available to companies, one that many smaller firms may not look into initially is a cloud-backed system. By embracing a hosted solution though, companies may be able to dramatically reduce the amount they spend on their communications framework while also being more efficient.

What is the cloud anyway?
One of the biggest trends in technology and IT today is the cloud, but it's possible that you have no idea what the cloud is beside those fluffy white things in the sky. When we at Woffle talk about the cloud, we are referring to a system in which your communications solution is supported by a remote data center. So instead of your fax, email and phone relying on an in-house infrastructure, all of your systems are off site and are accessed via our high speed internet connection.

This type of setup offers a number of distinct advantages. For starters, considering that the bulk of a communications system is not maintained by on-premise teams, the amount of money that a small business needs to pay to install and maintain its solution is dramatically reduced. Check out Woffle's cloud-hosted solutions here.

Cloud-based systems are also typically more reliable. When businesses rely on legacy solutions, they must hope that phone lines don't cut out and that on-premise equipment doesn't break down. With hosted setups, our high speed Internet connection powers everything.

This approach then enables businesses to further leverage their internal and external communications to combine multiple formats. When the internet is responsible for all modes of communication, it's much easier to integrate phone, email, instant messaging and screen sharing capabilities in one implementation. For example, imagine being able to have voicemails forwarded to your email inbox or to follow up on a chat with a screen share - with hosted collaboration systems, this can be your reality.

So what are you waiting for? Talk to us at Woffle today to learn about our cloud-based solutions and about how we can help your small business succeed!

Cloud


Internet: What if they pulled the plug?

Thursday, March 28, 2013

What if they pulled the plug?

Dat
.-

Disaster waiting to happen: One of the biggest concerns of the agencies whose job is to safeguard the internet is cyber-terrorism. Photo: iStock

It was 5.30am on November 22, 2012 when Greg Walsh had his first inkling that the internet had stopped working. As a farm manager near Warrnambool, he had risen early to check his email and send instructions to the farm managers he oversaw.

Except on this morning, his home connection to the internet wasn't working. That was not entirely unheard of but he discovered his mobile phone connection was also down. So too was his home phone.

There is the much bigger question of whether the global economy could survive losing the internet. 

It took a much older form of communication - radio - to learn that a fire had damaged the Telstra exchange. The mystery was solved but its ramifications were only just becoming clear.

Keen to get on with his day, Walsh started the 20-minute drive to town.

"I got halfway and realised I was almost out of petrol," Walsh says. "I pulled in to the nearest service station only to find that the payment service was down, and that I needed cash to buy petrol. And I had about $5 in my pocket."

When he finally made it into Warrnambool he found the ATMs there weren't working either. So he joined the long queue outside a bank where tellers were handing $100 to anyone who could prove their identity and recording the transactions on paper.

"That was the first realisation that this was something wider than just day-to-day communication," Walsh says. "It was a shock to realise just how widespread the ramifications were."

It took Telstra nearly three weeks to get the Warrnambool district fully back online. While mobile and some emergency telephone services were back within days, internet services took longer. During that time businesses lost thousands of dollars through being cut off from their systems and customers. To date Telstra has paid out up to $1000 to nearly 2000 businesses, and is assessing a smaller number of larger claims.

That a small fire could have such consequences is testimony to how deeply the internet has become woven into our society. It's even more remarkable because most Australians have been using it for fewer than 15 years.

As the people of Warrnambool learnt, it wasn't only email and web access that they had lost. The fire also took down their ability to conduct business and communicate with the rest of the digitally enabled world. For the better part of three weeks they disappeared into a digital black hole.

The Warrnambool incident was limited in scope but would it be possible to take down the entire internet? With business and society dependent on it, there is growing concern about whether the internet can survive attacks or other catastrophes.

"I think we'd have a global crisis of terrible proportions," says Rod Tucker, director of the institute for a broadband-enabled society at the University of Melbourne.

"It is conceivable that you'd have a major global crisis with civil unrest within weeks. Business is now adapted to the situation where everything happens via data and you don't need the telephone - and if we had to fall back to the telephone it couldn't cope with the way we do business today."

So it's good to know that a number of agencies, including the CSIRO and the intelligence organisation Defence Signals Directorate in Canberra are working to safeguard the internet.

One of their biggest concerns is cyber-terrorism, particularly when directed by nations.

In 2008, the former Soviet republic of Georgia accused Russia of a co-ordinated attack on Georgian websites as part of an offensive against South Ossetia. In effect the attack took Georgia off the internet.

According to the director of digital productivity and services at the CSIRO, Ian Oppermann, one of the greatest survival attributes of the web is inherent in its name - it is a web of connections designed to survive the loss of even a large number of individual points. The web's design means data is simply rerouted around problem areas.

"So it would be a pretty catastrophic set of events that would potentially do something to bring the web down."

One possible way to take down the internet is a concerted attack against the so-called top-level domain servers that send traffic to websites.

Hackers also take websites offline by directing massive volumes of junk traffic to them. But these are usually isolated to individual companies and organisations.

Natural dangers also exist. Oppermann says that on occasion North America has had problems with its interstate power line networks thanks to the effects of solar flares. Satellites are also vulnerable to this form of natural attack.

It is also possible to disrupt the physical connections that link the internet. According to the Asia-Pacific director of online security company Sophos, Rob Forsyth, problems would quickly emerge should anyone damage the five undersea cables that carry much of Australia's internet traffic.

"Australia does have satellite connections in addition to the undersea cables but satellites can be slow and expensive to move large amounts of data," Forsyth says. "Realistically though, even losing several of these connections is unlikely to wipe out the network on a global level."

As a vice-president for technology maker Cisco, Robert Pepper works with governments to better understand the internet's impact on society.

"We expect it to be there. Our lives are built around it. And having experienced it, if you had to go cold turkey, it would be a real shock.

Some changes would be fairly frivolous, such as the loss of online shopping. But the same network delivers life-saving information to medical professionals. Loss of the internet could truly have life or death consequences.

In Warrnambool, Walsh's first experience was the loss of email. But the impact was much greater for businesses that traded over the internet.

Warrnambool businessman Robert Lane says travellers were turning up to hotels after booking online only to find the staff had no record of their booking. Online retailers could not take orders; banks and merchants could not process electronic transactions, and online banking was unavailable.

But Lane says it wasn't all bad - at least initially. "For the vast majority of people, once they got over the initial panic, the overwhelming feeling was 'isn't it great - we'll have to get in the car and visit people'.

But Lane's business - the local arm of a business consulting firm - soon suffered. His colleagues are scattered around Victoria.

''Being able to manage, to get access to information, was quite difficult … we had to go and physically visit people." Which is not so easy when your clients and colleagues are hundreds of kilometres away.

The changes that the internet has wrought on Australian society are staggering, as is our willingness to embrace it. We have flocked to internet banking, and in travel, internet bookings now account for 40 per cent of overall bookings, according to PhoCusWright market research.

And without the internet, there would be many more lonely people. According to online dating service RSVP - owned by Fairfax Media - 8 per cent of Australians met their present or most recent partner online.

Then there is the impact on younger people who have never lived without the internet. More than 10 million Australians use Facebook to keep in touch with friends and family, share photos and organise events.

And there is the much bigger question of whether the global economy could survive losing the internet. Companies including Google, Amazon and eBay rely on it for their existence, and their values would plummet should the internet cease to function. Companies such as Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Apple would struggle to survive.

Whether the global financial markets could absorb the collapse of so many big companies without going into a tailspin and taking the global economy with them is doubtful. And without the internet and similar dedicated financial services networks it would be almost impossible to trade stock anyway. The world would lose the economic stimulus and productivity boost that the internet has provided. According to McKinsey & Company the internet has created 2.6 jobs for each job lost to technology-related efficiencies.

A study by Google and Deloitte Access Economics released in August 2011 found that 3.6 per cent of Australia's gross domestic product was a direct contribution by the internet, and delivered $50 billion in value. Also, 190,000 people were employed in occupations directly related to the internet. Were the internet to stop, these jobs would be lost immediately.

In Warrnambool Telstra continues to assess claims from business customers. The outage has left many of them asking how they can avoid a recurrence and how they might make themselves less dependent on the internet.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/it-news/what-if-they-pulled-the-plug-20130327-2gun9.html#ixzz2OmbgwgSj

Apple extends product warranty to 2 years!

Monday, March 18, 2013
Confronted by "aggressive competition" ... Apple.

Apple Australia: quietly extending the standard warranty period of most products from 12 months to 24. Photo: Getty Images

Apple's Australian stores will now fix faulty iPhones, iPads and Macs under warranty if they were purchased in the past two years - but don't expect the company's staff to tell you about it.

For some time Apple's standard 12-month warranty has appeared to conflict with Australian consumer law, which provides statutory warranties for a “reasonable” period of time, undermining Apple's ability to charge hundreds of dollars for AppleCare support plans that include extended warranties, as well as other services like telephone support.

On Friday, Apple's Australian retail store staff and authorised Apple resellers were notified about a change to Apple's internal policy on how it handled standard warranty claims.

Until now, many Apple consumers have reported on forums that store staff have only ever discussed with them a standard 12-month manufacturer warranty when selling, fixing or replacing Apple goods.

Apple has now changed this from 12 months to 24, which appears to bring it in line with Australian Consumer Law.

The change was announced to Apple staff via email and to resellers on a web portal and first revealed publicly by Apple enthusiast website MacTalk.com.au.

But it appears some high-up employees within Apple don't want the change talked about too widely.

One email Fairfax Media has seen, which was circulated within an Australian Apple store, told staff not to talk to customers about the detail of Apple's new policy.

Apple Australia media spokeswoman Fiona Martin had no comment about the changes.

What's "reasonable"?

Since January 1, 2011, when a new national Australian Consumer Law came into force, a statutory warranty for a “reasonable” period of time has existed for goods sold in Australia, even if the manufacturer's voluntary warranty (usually set at 12 months) has expired.

What equates to a “reasonable” period of time is undefined in the legislation, but an example given by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission in its warranties and refunds guide suggests that, for a product such as an expensive television, it can be up to 24 months.

Regardless of the law's introduction, many companies, including Apple, have avoided talking about the statutory rights of a customer covered under Australian Consumer Law.

For example, often Apple customers visiting the company's stores in Australia with an item outside the 12-month Apple warranty have had to pay a fee for their goods to be fixed or replaced if they don't know their rights and didn't purchase AppleCare, which extends their manufacturer warranty.

Even when Apple customers knew their statutory rights, they often had to put up a fight and lost when trying to get Apple or an authorised reseller to fix or replace their goods.

The change to Apple's policy hasn't been announced on Apple's website, but a web page on it that has been published for some time talks about a consumer's statutory warranty rights.

It repeats what Australian consumer law says and doesn't define a reasonable period of time.

In an interview, NSW Fair Trading Commissioner Rod Stowe said he agreed that for most electronic goods a reasonable period of time for it to work was up to 24 months.

“In terms of larger purchases ... you would expect customers to ask for more than 12 months [warranty],” he said.

Mr Stowe added that it was “rather surprising and disingenuous” for Apple store staff to be instructing employees not to tell customers about their move to 24-month warranties.

“To instruct your staff to not let people know [about the change] is something that seems of quite concern and I don't understand why they wouldn't want to be upfront about it," he said.

"Apple seems to be generally one of those businesses that is quite responsible to problems.”

Peter Wells, editor of MacTalk.com.au, said Apple had a tradition of trying to “ignore the rights of local consumer laws and instead using the same Cupertino policy worldwide”.

The new policy would be a welcome change for Apple staff and its resellers, Mr Wells said.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/apple-keeps-warranty-switch-under-wraps-20130318-2gahc.html#ixzz2NrryTwJm

Samsung unveils Galaxy S4

Friday, March 15, 2013

Samsung has unveiled its new flagship smartphone, the Galaxy S4, with a bigger screen and software that tracks eye movements.

Another feature detects wrist movement, letting users scroll the browser or sift through e-mails without touching the screen. 

The new Galaxy has a 5-inch screen, a 13-megapixel camera and motion-detection technology that lets users control features with face movements and hand gestures.

Revealed: The Samsung Galaxy S4.

Revealed: The Samsung Galaxy S4. Photo: Getty Images/AFP

The smartphone, announced during an event at New York's Radio City Music Hall, will begin sales in late April.

"Samsung Galaxy S4 has taken a quantum leap from Galaxy S3," said J.K. Shin, the head of Samsung's mobile unit. "Samsung Galaxy S4 is the fruit of the best-in-class hardware technology equipped with the most-advanced software features."

Features

The handset unveiled on Friday is faster, slimmer and lighter than its predecessor, the S3. It also features a dual-facing camera that combines images of the subject and the picture-taker into one frame.

Its 1080x1920 pixel Super AMOLED HD display at 441 pixels per inch trumps the iPhone 5's 1136x640 Retina display. The S4 has 2 gigabytes of RAM and will be available in 16, 32 and 64 GB models, with a Micro SD slot capable of housing up to 64GB extra storage space.

It will work on both 3G and high-speed 4G LTE mobile networks in Australia, and is expected to be offered by all major carriers.

The S4 will run on the latest version of Google's Android operating system (4.2.2 Jelly Bean) and be powered by Samsung's new Exynos 5 Octa processor. In the US, however, it will run on Qualcomm's quad-core chip.

Competition from Apple and new devices from BlackBerryNokia and Motorola is pressuring Samsung to add new software features to maintain its market lead. These include a function to detect facial movements and let users control the screen by the direction in which they look.

"When watching a video and suddenly someone calls you and get distracted, the video automatically stops without pressing a thing," said Lee Young Hee, executive vice president at Samsung mobile.

Another feature detects wrist movement, letting users scroll the browser or sift through e-mails without touching the screen. The phone also will capture sounds and voices at the moment a picture is taken.

The "Air Gesture" feature allows a user to accept a call, change a song or scroll a web page with a wave of the hand.

The Mail application, for instance, shows the first few lines of an email when a finger hovers above it in the list, and the Gallery application shows an expanded thumbnail.

In the browser, you can command the screen to scroll up by swiping from top to bottom a few inches from the phone; or with a different motion you can switch from one browser tab to another. If you tilt the phone while you are looking at it, the document or browser window will scroll up or down accordingly (this will not work if you are not looking at the phone).

When several S4s are in close proximity, they can link up to play the same music, simultaneously – perfect for silent discos.

The S4 is one of at least three high-end smartphones being released this year by Samsung. Others include a new version of its Galaxy Note and a device using the Intel-backed Tizen operating system, as the South Korean company tries to win customers in a slowing global market. Samsung could catapult the S4 back into the best-selling smartphone spot after the previous Galaxy lost that distinction to the iPhone 5 in the fourth quarter.

"The S4 will be the key to the success of the Samsung smartphone business this year," said Warren Lau, an analyst at Kim Eng Securities in Hong Kong. "We think S4 and Note 3 will continue to be well received by consumers globally, given the innovations."

Lau predicts Samsung's smartphone unit will boost sales by 40 per cent this year, outpacing industry growth of between 25 per cent and 30 per cent. Samsung did not immediately release prices for the phone.

Turf war

Shin boasted that the S4 will be a "life companion" that will "improve the way most people live every day."

That bold promise set the tone for the kind of flashy presentation associated with the showmanship of Apple, the company that Samsung has been trying to upstage. This was underlined by the fact that this was Samsung's first smartphone launch in the US, indeed only a few blocks away from Apple's flagship New York store. Apple contends Samsung has been trying to do it by stealing its ideas – an allegation has triggered bitter courtroom battles around the world.

The S4 compares with a 4-inch screen for Apple's iPhone 5, which also boasts a dual-core chip and an 8-megapixel camera.

Apple's sales growth last quarter was the slowest in more than two years, a sign the iPhone is losing its edge over other smartphones, said Park Hyun, an analyst at Tong Yang Securities in Seoul, who doesn't expect a new iPhone until mid-year at the earliest. Since the iPhone's debut in 2007, the Cupertino, California-based company has held one big phone unveiling a year, with the new product hitting the market in summer or early fall.

Tong Yang Securities expects Samsung to sell at least 60 million Galaxy S4 devices this year, bringing its total smartphone shipments to about 303 million.

Market saturation

Suwon, South Korea-based Samsung became the largest smartphone maker last year, overtaking Apple. Samsung had 29 per cent of global smartphone unit shipments in the fourth quarter, compared with 21 per cent for Apple, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The new S4 will be sold into a $US358 billion global market that is approaching saturation. Growth is projected to slow to 9.8 per cent in 2017 from 27 per cent this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

In addition to contending with the iPhone, Samsung has to fend off Chinese rivals offering handsets for $US100 to boost growth in emerging markets.

"We expect Samsung to expand its lead over Apple this year," said Neil Mawston, an analyst at Strategy Analytics in London. "Samsung has a bigger smartphone portfolio and deeper distribution than Apple at the moment."

The S4 will debut in the US, Hong Kong and South Korea on April 26 before reaching 155 countries through 327 mobile carriers.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/mobiles/samsung-unveils-galaxy-s4-20130315-2g4mp.html#ixzz2NZ6BUh9L

Telecommuting - the future ain't what it used to be...

Monday, February 25, 2013
Wollongong animator Phil Jennings moved from Sydney to get early access to the NBN and now works from home.

Wollongong animator Phil Jennings moved from Sydney to get early access to the NBN and now works from home. Photo: Sylvia Liber

With Yahoo and Google sledging teleworking as slow and detrimental to work quality and creativity, has working from home lost its lustre?

Yahoo's head of human resources Jackie Reses sent out a memo on Friday telling remote staff they must be working in the office by June and if they had an issue they could quit.

Is this the end to what Deloitte said would be one of the biggest structural changes to the Australian labour market this decade?

Teleworkers report having more time to spend with the family and increased productivity.

Teleworkers report having more time to spend with the family and increased productivity. Photo: Eve Fisher

Not so fast, say experts including Dr Yvette Blount, research co-ordinator at Macquarie University's Australia Anywhere Working Research Network, who argues that while Silicon Valley innovators may thrive on being together in the office, teleworking in Australia is taking off.

A new Melbourne University study published in the Telecommunications Journal of Australia found people who work from home start earlier, work up to three hours longer and get more done, while they felt more energised, less stressed and had fewer distractions.

Millions of Australians already do some work from home and this number expected to increase with the National Broadband Network (NBN). “There is a lot of telework occurring that is informal that's not being captured in the official statistics,” said Dr Blount.

Some people have more distractions at home than at work.

Some people have more distractions at home than at work. Photo: istock photo

However it is clear that teleworking isn't for everyone, including, ironically, some of the very companies building the online email, instant messaging, office productivity and other tools that enable us to work from anywhere.

“Being a Yahoo isn't just about your day-to-day job, it is about the interactions and experiences that are only possible in our offices,” said Reses in the Yahoo memo.

“Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings. Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home.”

BusinessInsider quoted a source saying Yahoo had many people working exclusively from home who were not productive.

In Sydney last week Google's chief financial officer Patrick Pichette, said “as few as possible” Google staff worked from home because it was not as conducive to collaboration and creating “magical moments”.

But Tim Fawcett, general manager of government affairs and policy at Cisco Australia, a key promoter of teleworking, said these companies were swimming against the tide. Around 90 per cent of Cisco's 75,000 global workforce telework at least one day a week, with 40 per cent classified as “mobile workers”.

“Our workers who work outside the office are consistently more engaged, more productive happier [and] have a higher sense of well being than traditional bricks and mortar workers,” said Fawcett.

In the latest teleworking statistics available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, as at November 2008, about a quarter of Australian workers - or 2.4 million people - worked at least some hours at home of which 32 per cent worked only or mainly at home. The number of teleworking hours increased with age.

However, the number of workers who have a formal teleworking arrangement is thought to be much closer to 6 per cent. The federal government aims to have at least 12 per cent of employees teleworking one day a week by 2020 (a target the federal public service has adopted itself), and teleworking has been pushed heavily by Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy.

The NBN is being touted as a game-changer for teleworkers and, according to Senator Conroy, will “potentially revolutionise how we will work”.

Deloitte has said teleworking will deliver nationally an extra $3.2 billion a year to the gross domestic product by 2020-21, the equivalent of 25,000 full-time jobs. In a report released late last year it called teleworking “one of the biggest structural changes to the labour market this decade”.

Dr Blount said telecommuting was not a one-size-fits-all solution and in each case a business case needed to be made.

Her research has found that in some instances team members and managers felt reluctant to “bother” teleworkers at home which could hinder collaboration, while at the same time the teleworkers themselves reported being far more productive and satisfied. Some however experienced “social and professional isolation”.

“One of the things that Google and Yahoo are aware of is they want to create a certain culture in their organisations and it's really difficult to do that if people aren't physically there,” said Dr Blount.

Teleworkers also reported working longer hours to justify the privilege of working from home. Dr Blount said this raised the question of whether teleworkers were more productive or just working harder, however more research was sorely needed.

She said a key question her research would be asking was, “we've been talking about this since the 1970s so why isn't it [teleworking] business as usual?”.

NBN Co chief Mike Quigley said he had previously employed software developers who worked from home and were “immensely productive”, in some cases 10 or 20 times more productive than average.

“There's some jobs that don't lend themselves to teleworking but there's a lot of jobs that do”, said Quigley, adding many workers mixed it up spending some time at home and some time at work. While that flexibility was “pretty powerful” there had to be a level of trust between the employee and employer.

He could not say how many NBN Co workers worked from home but a formal policy was in place so that “if somebody is going to telework somebody from our HR department goes out, has a look at where they're going to be working from” to see whether the appropriate conditions were in place.


Courtesy of SMH

Google Apps is the go!!

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Google Apps

 

Run your business with online tools from Google. Over 4 million businesses already do!

Google Apps for Business is a suite of online tools including email, calendar, documents and more.

We are Google Apps Authorised Resellers and can help you go Google!


Business Gmail

Email (@your_company.com) with 25GB storage, instant messaging, and voice and video chat.


Google Calendar

Online, shareable calendars that make it easy to schedule meetings.


Google Docs/Drive

Online documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and forms. Plus, online storage for any type of file.


Google Sites

Easy-to-create websites for intranets and team projects – no coding required.

Turning point for small-business cloud productivity suites?

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Summary: The venerable Office isn't going away anytime soon, but get ready to hear a whole lot more in 2013 from Microsoft and rival Google about how cloud apps can help small businesses become more efficient.

Last year, Google raised eyebrows when it stopped offering a free version of its Google Apps for small businesses. At the time, I wondered whether or not this could wind up helping Microsoft, which has been turning up the sales rhetoric behind its rival Office 365 cloud applications suite.

But upon further reflection and a conversation with Rich Rao (director of Google Apps for the SMB and Education markets), I think the move is more indicative of how serious Google is about winning over business for its blossoming cloud applications division.

Under the new policy, small businesses that want to use Google Apps have to opt for the Premium edition, which costs $50 per user per year (or $5 per user per month). Features of that service include 24/7 phone support, a 25-gigabyte inbox, and a 99.9 percent uptime guarantee. Current business users have been grandfathered on the free service.

"With focus, we'll be able to do even more for our business customers," wrote Clay Bavor, director of product management for Google Apps, at the time of the change.

The pricing change also makes it a whole lot simpler to compare Google Apps with Office 365 on the basis of their respective merits.

Now, small businesses can't be lured by the free-ness of the Google cloud offering--they have to look at the features and the backgrounds of the companies behind these respective services. And IT services and consulting firms that help small businesses with IT strategy have more than one legitimate tool in their cloud services tool back around which they can potentially build real-world solutions.

One phenomenon that Google is really counting on to drive both short-term and long-term adoption is the desire of many small businesses owners to apply technology they use in their personal lives for business purposes, Rao said.

That in itself isn't such a surprising revelation--it's the whole impetus behind the bring-your-own-device (BYOD) movement. But one thing that really comes down in favor of cloud applications is the fact that most of us are using at least two devices, now, to manage our schedules and lives. No one wants to waste time worrying about how to keep things straight or in provisioning new users when someone joins the team--either actual or virtual.

One other serious wildcard--one that actually favors Google--is the fact that at least one in three college students cite work mobility and the technology that they will be able to use on the job as factors they would prioritize in deciding where to work, according to data cited by Rao.

"People understand how transformative this can be," he said.

I also personally think that people's comfort level with the Chrome Web browser and the integration between the browser and Google Apps shouldn't be overlooked. One thing to watch closely is sales forChromebooks, inexpensive notebook computers that essentially use the browse as the central operating system and user interface.

You won't hear Microsoft talk much about the specifics of Office 365 adoption, but Google claims about 5 million users for its cloud business productivity suite. New York startup BetterCloud just received $5 million in series A financing earlier this month to help businesses incorporate Google's cloud suite, another development that underscores how important the venture capital communities think cloud productivity suites will be in the future--as a new generation looks beyond the legacy of Microsoft Office.

You can read more about what business users are doing with Google Apps at its blog. For a miniature case study of how Google Apps has transformed management and communications for a small business in California, see the video below.